Greening v. Moran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a facial attack was being made because, “although the parties do reference documents subject to judicial notice and/or attached to the Complaint, Defendant does not offer any additional evidence in support of its jurisdictional arguments”
• declining to address argument where the defendants “cite[d] no authority to support 21 a conclusion” because “[t]he Court will not manufacture arguments for either party”
• confirming “it is appropriate for a no action alternative to reflect ‘historical uses’ of a resource”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).