Greenfield v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that under identical limitation language, the jury’s verdicts for medical expenses and past wages were “duplicative” of workers’ compensation payments because they covered the same type of injury
• finding that under identical limitation language, the jury's verdicts for medical expenses and past wages were \duplicative\ of workers' compensation payments because they covered the same type of injury
• deciding setoff issues as a matter of law after trial
• “When such language is included in policies covering underinsured motorists, it is referred to generically as a reduction-of-benefits provision.”
• “While offsets are permissive under Iowa Code section 516A.2(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).