Greenebaum v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff bore a similar burden of proof in a bankruptcy proceeding because “the preponderance of evidence standard governs decisions whether to revoke a confirmation order due to fraud”
• dismissing sua sponte a pro se plaintiff’s amended complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) where the amended complaint contained no facts or allegations pertaining to the unnamed defendants other than the inclusion of “John Does 1-20” in the caption.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).