Greene, V. v. Sommer Law Group, P.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “An expert opinion requires some explanation as to how the expert came to his conclusion and what methodologies or evidence substantiate that conclusion.”
• “An expert opinion requires some explanation as to how the expert came to his conclusion and what methodologies or evidence substantiate that conclusion.” (emphasis added)
• “An expert opinion requires some explanation as to how the expert came to his conclusion and what methodologies or evidence substantiate that conclusion.”
• “[T]his Circuit has explained that it is appropriate for the district court to determine the admissibility of scientific evidence and to rely only on admissible evidence in ruling on summary judgment.”
• “Thus, to overcome Medtronic’s arguments and survive summary judgment, the Riegels had to come forward with competent evidence excluding Medtronic’s proffered alternative causes as the actual origin of the catheter’s rupture”
• “As the contrasting terms ‘premarket notification’ and ‘premarket approval’ suggest, the § 510(k

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).