Greene v. Camreta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the ‘constitutional right to be free from the knowing presentation of false or perjured evidence’ is clearly established” (quoting Devereaux v. Perez, 218 F.3d 1045, 1055–56 (9th Cir. 2000))
• vacated in part on other grounds by Green v. Camreta, 661 F.3d 1201 (9th Cir. 2011
• “The alleged misrepresentation was ‘material’ to the granting of the removal order if the Juvenile Court would have declined to issue the order had [the defendant] been truthful.”
• applying special needs analysis for purposes of ascertaining qualified immunity
• identifying a separate “need” is a “threshold inquiry”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).