Greenberg v. Rosenberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the concept of ‘consent’ used in the law of extortion is highly unconventional and does not connote a voluntary or elective conferral of property”
• defining the phrase “receipt of stolen property” in section 101(a)(43)(G
• “[A] thief may not receive property from himself.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).