· 2/9/2006
Greenberg v. Myers
Citations
- 340 Or. 65
- 127 P.3d 1192
- 2006 Ore. LEXIS 83
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Attorney General may not select and identify in caption only one of multiple subjects, such that caption understates scope of subject mat- ter
- Attorney General may not select and identify in caption only one of multiple subjects, such that caption understates scope of subject matter
- “What the Attorney General cannot do is select and identify in a caption only one out of multiple subjects and thus understate the scope of the proposed measure’s subject matter.”
- measure at issue incorporated multi-part enforcement scheme including new forms of liability that “would enact major changes to Oregon law that likely would be significant to the voting public”
- measure at issue incorporated multi-part enforcement scheme including new forms of liability that “would enact major changes to Oregon law that likely would be significant to the voting public”
- on review, Attorney General proposed a revised “yes” vote result statement to satisfy legal requirements, but the petitioner objected that the revision was not sufficient; court nevertheless considered and resolved the objection
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carson, Gillette, Durham, Riggs, De Muniz, Balmer, Krstler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.