Greenberg v. Board of Education

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that Rule 45 pro vides a party several distinct means of resisting a subpoena duces tecum
• stating that interest in institutional security is a well-recognized federal common law privilege
• “[t]he scope of material obtained by a Rule 45 subpoena is as broad as permitted under the discovery rules ... if the material is relevant, not privileged, and is, or is likely to lead to, admissible evidence, it is obtainable by way of a subpoena.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).