Skip to main content
· 2/24/2014

Green v. Wolfe

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 1321
  • 188 L. Ed. 2d 335
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3493
  • 571 U.S. 1217
  • 2014 WL 684354
  • 2014 U.S. LEXIS 1395

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiff forfeited his retaliation claim by failing to assert any argument in response to defendant’s motion for summary judgment on all counts
  • noting that when specifics of derogatory language is not raised until a plaintiff’s deposition, it can still be substantively considered at summary judgement
  • noting that the Seventh Circuit “has repeatedly treated a supervisor’s use of racially toxic language in the workplace as much more serious than a co-worker’s”
  • reversing summary judgment on Title VII hos- tile environment claim but holding that retaliation claim based on the hostile conduct was waived
  • noting the rejection of the “hellish” standard for hostile work environment claims in light of Harris
  • noting the rejection of the “hellish” standard for hostile work environment claims in light of Harris

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.