Green v. Texas Workers' Compensation Insurance Facility

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assuming without deciding that trial court's excluding treating physician's causation testimony, based primarily on what appears to be differential diagnosis, was not abuse of discretion, but noting issue was close one
• assuming without deciding that trial court's excluding treating physician’s causation testimony, based primarily on what appears to be differential diagnosis, was not abuse of discretion, but noting issue was close one
• assuming without deciding that trial court's excluding treating physician's causation testimony, based primarily on what appears to be differential diagnosis, was not abuse of discretion, but noting issue was close one

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).