Skip to main content
· 5/26/1982

Green v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.

Citations

  • 647 P.2d 166
  • 132 Ariz. 468
  • 28 A.L.R. 4th 1258
  • 1982 Ariz. LEXIS 205

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[B]y virtue of\ Rule 4(c), \matters ... may be determined as expeditiously as is necessary\
  • “[B]y virtue of’ Rule 4(c), “matters ... may be determined as expeditiously as is necessary”
  • “[T]he discretionary power given the sentencing court to impose, modify, or revoke probation is limited by several statutory provisions, as well as constitutional due process considerations.”
  • court could transfer probationer to different jail and modify release time privileges but could not increase jail time beyond length originally imposed at sentencing
  • credit allowed for time spent in jail as a condition of probation includes time spent on work furlough or authorized release
  • Several statutes, as well as constitutional due process considerations, limit the court’s authority “to impose, modify, or revoke probation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feldman, Holohan, Gordon, Hays, Cameron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.