Green v. State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that being prevented from traveling into the United States is an Article III injury
• holding that being prevented from traveling into the United States is an Article III injury
• noting that we expressed “no opinion on the validity of the underlying constitutional claims”
• noting that there are significant numbers of erroneous placements on the federal watchlists
• explaining that “[m]erely because” plaintiff may be subject to the same requirements through other agency rules, plaintiff is “not preclude[d]” “from challenging” a single set of directives
• noting that redressability is not foreclosed by the existence of further 5 obstacles to complete relief as plaintiffs are “entitled to tackle one roadblock at a 6 time”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).