Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 3/13/1996
Green v. State
Citations
- 52 Ark. App. 244
- 917 S.W.2d 171
- 1996 Ark. App. LEXIS 154
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- overruling necessity found where the prosecutor suffered a 21 mental breakdown and failed to return to trial after a lunch break
- manifest necessity established when prosecutor became ill and substitution of deputy prosecutor was precluded by virtue of deputy prosecutor's conflict with one juror
- manifest necessity established when prosecutor became ill and substitution of deputy prosecutor was precluded by virtue of deputy prosecutor’s conflict with one juror
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Agree, Pittman, Robbins, Rogers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Franklin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1971-10-25· cited 42×
- Shaw v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1991-01-28· cited 27×
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1986-05-27· cited 24×
- Cody & Muse v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1963-10-14· cited 13×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1992-01-13· cited 12×
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1986-02-03· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.