Green v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion to proceed pro se when defendant refused to comply with court rule mandating that briefs be either typed or printed
• defendant's motion to proceed pro se was denied because of his declared refusal to comply with a court rule that briefs had to be printed or typewritten

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Gallagher
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1994-06-20· cited 29×
• Maulding v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1989-09-11· cited 16×
• Howard v. Lockhart
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1989-10-09· cited 13×
• Wade v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1986-01-21· cited 8×
• Clark v. Perez
  S.D. New York· 2006-09-21· cited 8×
• State v. Drew
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2006-02-03· cited 5×
• Long v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1983-11-21· cited 2×
• Roberts v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1986-04-28· cited 2×
• Gay v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1986-06-09· cited 2×
• Miner v. Furman
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1994-12-05· cited 2×
• Bharodia v. Pledger
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-10-28· cited 2×
• Jerry Hardcastle v. State of Tennessee
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2000-08-10
• Wade v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1986-03-31