Green v. Rubenstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that objections that do not call the court’s attention to “any specific error by the magistrate judge” are vague and conclusory, and do not merit review by the court
• finding that, while the plaintiff had clearly “exhausted administrative remedies with respect to his Eighth Amendment claim,” he had not exhausted 2 “To state a colorable First Amendment retaliation claim, a plaintiff must allege that (1
• “[A] prisoner ... may not exhaust administrative remedies during the pendency of the federal suit.”
• “The State and its agencies such as the Division of Corrections are not ‘persons’ amenable to suit under Section 1983 for damages.”
• “The State and its agencies such as the Division of Corrections are not ‘persons’ amenable to suit under Section 1983 for damages.”
• “The State and its agencies such as the Division of Corrections are not ‘persons’ amenable to suit under section 1983 for damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).