Skip to main content
· 3/21/1966

Green v. Osgood-Lewis-Perkins, Inc.

Citations

  • 383 U.S. 946
  • 86 S. Ct. 1204

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a court may deny leave to supplement a complaint on grounds of undue delay, prejudice to the opposing party, or futility
  • alleging that defendant's refusal to approve the construction of low income housing developments contravened the consent decree to provide such housing
  • alleging that defendant’s refusal to approve the construction of low income housing developments contravened the consent decree to provide such housing
  • noting that Rule 15(d) is intended as a \tool of judicial economy and convenience\
  • noting that the district court retained jurisdiction to ensure compliance with order
  • allowing plaintiffs to file supplemental complaint challenging conduct occurring after entry of final consent decree

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.