Green v. Mapco Petroleum, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a party’s “burden under Rule 26(b)(3
• “With regard to nonparties such as plaintiff’s expert witness, a request for documents may be made by subpoena duces tecum pursuant to Rule 45.”
• “The defendants’ burden under Rule 26(b)(3) cannot be avoided simply because the attorney’s work product document in question was transmitted to his client’s expert witness … . To hold otherwise would substantially diminish the protection Rule 26(b)(3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).