· 6/22/1982
Green v. Lupo
Citations
- 647 P.2d 51
- 32 Wash. App. 318
- 1982 Wash. App. LEXIS 2952
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ‘There is a strong presumption in Washington that easements are appurtenant to some particular tract of land; personal easements, easements in gross, are not favored.”
- grant of easement for ingress, egress, and utilities purposes to the owners of adjacent land indicates appurtenance
- grant of easement for ingress, egress, and utilities purposes to the owners of adjacent land indicates appurtenance
- “There is a strong presumption in Washington that easements are appurtenant to some particular tract of land; personal easements, easements in gross, are not favored.”
- “There is a strong presumption in Washington that easements are appurtenant to some particular tract of land; personal easements, easements in gross, are not favored.”
- grant of easement for ingress, egress, and utilities purposes to the owners of adjacent land indicates appurtenance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Petrich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.