Green v. Lamarque

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remarking that a conviction arose “pursuant to a plea, not a trial”
• comparing the manner in which the prosecutor questioned possible jurors including an alternate
• “Additional evidence of racial discrimination includes the fact that the prosecutor used peremptory challenges to remove all six African-Americans from the seated jury pool.”
• a federal habeas court “must conduct [the comparative juror] analysis de novo, rather than remanding for the state courts to do so.”
• state 21 court’s finding that the prosecutor’s strike was not racially motivated was unreasonable in light 22 of the record before that court
• state 19 court’s finding that the prosecutor’s strike was not racially motivated was unreasonable in light 20 of the record before that court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).