Green v. Green.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[c]learly” a finding of fact that “ ‘defendant could have paid at least a portion of said money, as provided in said order’ ” could not support an order of contempt based on a failure to pay alimony
• under prior statute, finding present ability to pay part of arrearage did not support jailing contemnor where release conditioned on paying total ar-rearage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Spears v. Spears
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2016-02-02· cited 23×
• County of Durham by and Through Durham DSS v. Burnette
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-10-16· cited 9×