Green v. Federal Deposit Insurance (In Re Tamalpais Bancorp)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that though a claim may have “a profound impact on the bankruptcy proceedings,” it will nevertheless be non-core if it could have been brought in the absence of a bankruptcy case
• “[A] movant must do 15 more than merely suggest that novel issues of law could possibly arise in a bankruptcy 16 proceeding.”
• ‘[Mandatory withdrawal] is reserved for cases where substantial and material consideration of non-Bankruptcy Code federal statutes is necessary for the resolution of the proceeding.”
• “While Trustee’s claim will have a profound impact on the bankruptcy 1 traditional contract dispute that could have been brought even if Debtor had never filed for 2 bankruptcy. Trustee’s claim is therefore non-core.”
• “While Trustee’s claim will have a profound impact on the bankruptcy 1 traditional contract dispute that could have been brought even if Debtor had never filed for 2 bankruptcy. Trustee’s claim is therefore non-core.”
• “[Njeither denying nor granting [the] motion [to withdraw reference] will facilitate forum shopping here because a district court will ultimately need to address the issues, whether initially or on de novo review of the bankruptcy court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).