Green v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[b]ima-toprost’s mechanism of action is greatly debated in this case,” with Barr and San-doz arguing it functions as a “prodrug” with no inherent biological activity, and Allergan arguing that it is not a prodrug, but rather acts on a novel prostamide receptor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).