Green v. Columbus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to decide what standard of review applied to a reasonable fear determination because petitioner’s claim lacked merit under any standard of review
• assuming hypothetical jurisdiction when the petitioner does not state a colorable constitutional or legal claim and that substantial evidence supports the IJ's holding that the petitioner has not established a \reasonable possibility\ of persecution or torture
• \[W]e need not and do not reach the question of whether this standard should apply to an IJ's concurrence with an [asylum officer's] negative reasonable fear determination because [petitioner's] claim fails even under the substantial evidence standard he says should apply.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).