Green & Middlesworth v. Prettyman
Citations
- 17 Cal. 401
Syllabus
<p>In this case—which was ejectment for fifteen acres of land—the Court instructed the jury that, “ if they believed from the evidence that plaintiffs stood quietly by and saw and knew of defendant’s purchase of the premises, his possession and improvements of the same, and that the defendant purchased the same in good faith and not in fraud of plaintiffs’ rights, and that plaintiffs did not notify him of their claim, then they, the plaintiffs, are estopped from denying his rights Held, that the instruction, taken in connection with the facts, did not correctly state the doctrine of estoppel.</p> <p>Biddle Boggs v. Merced Mining Co., (14 Cal. 366) as to estoppel, affirmed.</p>
Judges: Baldwin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.