GREEN, MICHAEL C. v. DEMARCO, HONORABLE JOHN

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “{t]he mandate rule requires a district court on remand to effect mandate and to do nothing else.”
• describing the three limited circumstances where a second panel can re-examine a prior panel’s holding
• The district court’s decision to reject the Fifth Circuit’s ruling as “clearly erroneous” on remand was “extraordinary conduct that would lead to chaos if routinely done”
• “[W]e will only reexamine issues of law addressed by a prior panel opinion in a subsequent appeal of the same case if (i) the evidence on a subsequent trial was substantially different, (ii

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).