· 1/29/1901
Green County v. Kortrecht
Citations
- 106 F. 987
- 45 C.C.A. 690
- 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 3652
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding plaintiffs were entitled to adverse inference sanctions based on defendant bank’s withholding of evidence during discovery
- “As far as this court knows, the Bank has not faced any repercussions as a result of its prior disclosures. Yet it emphasizes its fear of such reprisals as a reason for its noncompliance here.” (citation omitted)
- “As far as this court knows, the Bank has not faced any repercussions as a result of its prior disclosures. Yet it emphasizes its fear of such reprisals as a reason for its noncompliance here.” (citation omitted)
- ordering preclusion sanction for repeated failures to produce ordered discovery
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McCormick, Pardee, Shelby
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.