Green Bay & Western Railroad v. Transportation Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial for failing to object to hearsay evidence that was the only evidence offered to prove the elements of defendant’s traffic offenses
• “[The defendant’s] challenges to [a witness’s] expert opinion based on a lack of personal knowledge and insufficient investigation go to the weight and credibility, not admissibility, of the testimony.”
• “[The defendant’s] challenges to [a witness’s] expert opinion based on a lack of personal knowledge and insufficient investigation go to the weight and credibility, not admissibility, of the testimony.”
• attestations in affidavit that evidence showed that defendant was the driver of a car that had been involved in an automobile accident in which a person had been killed and that defendant admitted that he had been drinking earlier that night established probable cause for search warrant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).