Grecu v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that it is proper to consider a supplemental motion after the filing period has passed based on the theory that such a motion could be construed as a writ of error coram nobis, although not applying that holding to the facts before it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Campbell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-04-07· cited 34×
• Haley v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1956-04-18· cited 10×
• Sutton v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1960-05-09· cited 7×
• Grecu v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1956-02-06· cited 6×
• State v. Unosawa
  Washington Supreme Court· 1956-04-12· cited 3×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• People v. Malone
  California Court of Appeal· 1947-10-24· cited 52×