Greathead v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• setting forth four factors that are relevant to determining whether “an employee’s 'horseplay' is substantial enough to preclude compensability”
• “Although the two [exclusions] may overlap to a-certain degree, they are not to be read together.”
• “As to . . . a ‘co-employee’ or ‘cross-employee’ exclusion, the case law is clear that coverage of the co-employee will be excluded where (1) the co-employee is an insured under the policy, and (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).