Greater Dayton Premier Mgt. v. Hicks
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 5655
Syllabus
Appellant's pro se brief fails to comply with App.R. 16 in every respect, and her appeal from the trial court's eviction order is subject to dismissal on that basis. Alternatively, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in adopting the magistrate's decision that appellant's failure to make payments for repairs and maintenance charges under her lease with appellee was willful, that appellant was not entitled to equitable relief, and that appellee was entitled to restitution of the premises. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Huffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.