Greater Chicago Combine & Center Inc. v. City of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming summary judgment on merits of federal constitutional claims that raised substantial federal questions
• affirming summary judgment on merits of federal constitutional claims that raised substantial federal questions
• “Keying off the words ‘clearly arbitrary and unreasonable’ as well as the other rational basis language in Euclid, our precedent has routinely applied Euclid as a rational basis rule for substantive due process and equal protection challenges to municipal ordinances”
• “Keying off the words ‘clearly arbitrary and unreasonable’ as well as the other rational basis language in Euclid, our precedent has -12- routinely applied Euclid as a rational basis rule for substantive due process and equal protection challenges to municipal ordinances”
• \[0]ur precedent has routinely applied [Ambler Realty Co.] as a rational basis rule for substantive due process and equal protection challenges to municipal ordinances.\
• federal court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over purported federal claims that are “insubstantial or frivolous”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).