Great Western Steel, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “lack of discriminatory intent and the absence of any discriminatory effect” do not preclude a “determin[ation] [of] liability” under § 3604(c)
• holding that the “lack of discriminatory intent and the absence of any discriminatory effect” do not preclude a “determinfetion] [of] liability” under § 3604(c)
• holding that black plaintiffs had standing because they personally read advertisements that “would indicate a racial 12 USCA4 Appeal: 21-1919 Doc: 89 Filed: 03/04/2025 Pg: 13 of 13 preference to the ordinary reader”
• noting that the district court gave limited weight to plaintiffs’ testimony because of their commitment to the cause
• noting that “an organization’s abstract concern with a subject that could be affected by an adjudication does not substitute for the concrete injury required by Art. III”
• housing organization had standing to sue based on diversion of resources to pursue litigation and other legal efforts to counteract the discrimination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).