Skip to main content
· 4/4/1995

Great West Cas. Co. v. Barnick

Citations

  • 529 N.W.2d 504
  • 1995 Minn. App. LEXIS 468
  • 1995 WL 142371

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting under an effectively identical supplementary payments provision that “[t]he introductory language is broad, covering any claim investigated or settled or any suit”
  • plain and ordinary meaning of “judgment” relates to judicial decision or judicial proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Considered and Decided by Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.