Skip to main content
· 10/7/1993

Great Southern v. First Southern

Citations

  • 625 So. 2d 463
  • 30 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1522
  • 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 525
  • 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1630
  • 1993 WL 391614

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the trial court erred “by failing to view the mark as a whole, as required”
  • adopting principles for resolving federal dilution action as appropriate for resolution of dilution action under Florida law
  • suggestive marks include Artype for cutout letters for artists, Coppertone for sun tan oil, Gobble Gobble for processed turkey meat, and Heartwise for low-fat foods

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.