Skip to main content
· 2/19/1959

Great Southern Trucking Co. v. Standard Wholesale Grocery Co.

Citations

  • 110 So. 2d 507

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that subpoenaed invoices were not protected by attorney-client privilege “to the extent that they do not disclose confidential communications which [the client] disclosed to [his][a]ttorneys” and concluding that any references to such confidential communications could be redacted
  • absent.abuse, rulings on motions to quash rest. in the discretion of the court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carroll, Chas, Horton, Pearson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.