Great Southern Aircraft Corp. v. Kraus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[f]or a disclosure claim to . . . provide a compensable benefit to stockholders, the supplemental disclosure that was sought and obtained must be material”
• holding that the omission of information as to why the board of directors negotiated to remove a condition from the tender offer did not state a valid disclosure claim
• holding that the omission of information as to why the board of directors negotiated to remove a condition from the tender offer did not state a valid disclosure claim
• holding that the board’s “underlying reasons for acting” generally are not deemed material
• holding that the board's \underlying reasons for acting\ generally not considered material
• holding that the board’s “underlying reasons for acting” generally not deemed material

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).