Great Pines Water Co., Inc. v. Liqui-Box Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• vacating and remanding damages award where “the evidence [was] insufficient to support loss of profits” and this court could not determine “whether the jury awarded sums for lost profits”
• “Great Pines had a full opportunity to establish its claim for lost profits and consequential damages; however, having failed to do so, it may not retry its claim for these damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).