Great Northern Refining Co. v. Lutes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Rule 23(a)’s adequacy requirement is met if there are no conflicts between the representative and class interests and the representative’s attorneys are qualified, experienced, and generally able to conduct the litigation.”
• “Rule 23(a)’s adequacy requirement is met if there are no conflicts between the representative and class interests and the representative’s attorneys are qualified, experienced, and generally able to conduct the litigation.”’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).