Skip to main content
· 4/3/1916

Great Northern Railway Co. v. Knapp

Citations

  • 240 U.S. 464
  • 36 S. Ct. 399
  • 60 L. Ed. 745
  • 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1472

Syllabus

<p>Where there is no question. as to the interpretation of the Employers’ Liability Act or as to the definition of legal principles in its application, but the question is simply whether there were matters for determination of the jury, this, court, with due regard to the appropriate exercise of its jurisdiction, will not disturb the decision of the court below unless error is palpable.</p> <p>In cases of this sort arising under the Employers’ Liability Act, not be-' ing of exceptional character, this court confines itself tb the mere announcement of its conclusion,' as it does, in this case,' of affirmance.</p> <p>130 Minnesota, 405, affirmed.</p>

Judges: Hughes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.