Great Northern Railway Co. v. Alexander
Citations
- 246 U.S. 276
- 38 S. Ct. 237
- 62 L. Ed. 713
- 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1545
Syllabus
<p>A case arising under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act between citizens of different States is not removable from a state to a federal District Court on either ground.</p> <p>■ In the absence of a fraudulent purpose to defeat removal, the status, with respect tó remoyability, of a case alleged to be one arising under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act depends not upon what the defendant may allege or prove or what the court may, after hearing upon the merits, in invitum, order, but solely upon the form which the plaintiff voluntarily gives to his pleadings initially and as the case progresses.</p> <p>Therefore, where the complaint states a cause under the Federal Act, the failure of the plaintiff to prove that the employee was engaged in interstate commerce when injured will not leave the case removable because of diverse citizenship appearing in the complaint. A contention to the contrary is not a claim of federal right of sufficient substance to afford this court jurisdiction to review a state court's judgment.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing the voluntary-involuntary rule applies only “in the absence of a fraudulent purpose to defeat removal”
- recognizing the voluntary-involuntary rule applies only “in the absence of a fraudulent purpose to defeat removal”
- “[T]he plaintiff may by the allegations of his complaint determine the status with respect to removability of a case”
- a nonremovable case cannot be converted into a removable one by, inter alia, a court order \upon any issue tried upon the merits ...\
- “[T]he plaintiff may by the allegations of his complaint determine the status with respect to re-movability of a case.”
- “[T]he plaintiff may by the allegations of his complaint determine the status with respect to removability of a case.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clarke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.