Skip to main content
· 6/3/2016

Great Health Care Chiropractic, P.C. v. Hereford Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that 18 U.S.C. § 242 is not money-mandating and noting “the general rule that the Tucker Act does not grant the Court of Federal Claims jurisdiction to enforce the federal criminal code”
  • affirming dismissal of claims brought under 18 U.S.C. § 242, given that it is found within the criminal code and not money-mandating
  • per 1 States armed forces sexually assaulted her on a number of occasions after infiltrating her home and using sleeping gas to render her unconscious. She asserts various constitutional, federal statutory, and common law claims. Pending before the Court are (1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.