Skip to main content
· 2/19/1932

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Industrial Commission

Citations

  • 180 N.E. 460
  • 347 Ill. 596

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “As above pointed out, the gist of the plaintiffs complaint and its claim to equitable relief is based upon damages alleged to be feared through the defendant’s competition in practicing dentistry”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: DeYoung

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.