Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Imbraguglio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that LE §§ 9-901 and 9-902 authorize actions against a third party “responsible for the injury”
• setting forth five factors and citing cases setting forth same five factors for worker’s compensation context
• “Ordinarily, the existence of the employer/employee relationship is a question reserved for the fact finder”
• “That an employee can concurrently serve two employers is not a novel concept in Maryland law”
• “Ordinarily, the existence of the employer/employee relationship is a question reserved for the fact finder.”
• “Under [The MWCA] . . . employers are immune . . . from suit by their employees for work-related injuries.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).