Great American Insurance Company v. Gross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing all three in determining that the district court erred in dismissing the court on Cobrado River abstention grounds
• finding that where application of Virginia law is required and where there are no Virginia state proceedings, “Virginia’s interest [is] better served by having the coverage issues decided by a federal court sitting in Virginia, rather than a state court sitting in Alabama”
• stating district courts may decline jurisdiction where there is a question of state law that is “unsettled”
• stating district courts may decline jurisdiction where there is a question of state law that is “unsettled”
• reviewing all three criteria in determining that the district court erred in dismissing the suit on Colorado River abstention grounds
• finding proceedings not parallel when parties were different in state and federal actions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).