Great a & P Tea Co. v. Aveilhe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• jury could not reasonably infer that a ―series of events consisting of two clerks conversing, laughing, and one pulling upon the other causing him to fall into a bystanding customer, could be of any benefit to their employer or in furtherance of the duties assigned to them‖

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• District of Columbia v. Davis
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-05-19· cited 91×
• Estelle Jordan v. Lawrence Medley
  D.C. Circuit· 1983-06-14· cited 82×
• Murphy v. Army Distaff Foundation, Inc.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-03-11· cited 48×
• Teltschik v. Williams & Jensen, Pllc
  District of Columbia· 2010-02-12· cited 27×
• Walter Blair, II v. DC & Thaddeus Modlin, Jr.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-08-02· cited 27×
• Meyers v. National Detective Agency, Inc.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1971-09-28· cited 17×
• Courtney v. Giant Food, Inc.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1966-07-05· cited 12×
• Harmon v. Liss
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1955-09-15· cited 12×
• District of Columbia v. Remi Bamidele
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-11-13· cited 12×
• Presley v. Commercial Credit Corporation
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1962-02-21· cited 11×
• International Distributing Co. v. American District Telegraph Co.
  District of Columbia· 1974-11-22· cited 3×
• Sims v. EAST WASHINGTON RAILWAY COMPANY
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1966-09-20· cited 3×
• Ogilby v. Eskey
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1956-03-20· cited 2×

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gunning v. Cooley
  Supreme Court· 1930-03-12· cited 665×
• Washington Gas Light Co. v. Lansden
  Supreme Court· 1899-01-16· cited 199×
• Shewmaker v. Capital Transit Co.
  D.C. Circuit· 1944-05-29· cited 87×
• Fleming v. Bronfin
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1951-05-15· cited 34×
• Park Transfer Co. v. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co.
  D.C. Circuit· 1944-04-24· cited 25×
• Grimes v. B. F. Saul Co.
  D.C. Circuit· 1931-01-06· cited 23×
• Dilli v. Johnson
  D.C. Circuit· 1939-10-30· cited 22×
• Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Cox
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1935-09-26· cited 21×
• Lane v. Safeway Stores, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1939-06-02· cited 15×
• M. J. Uline Co. v. Cashdan
  D.C. Circuit· 1948-10-18· cited 15×
• Evers v. Krouse
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1904-06-20· cited 15×
• Sullivan v. Crowley
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1940-10-31· cited 11×
• Creamer v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1935-10-01· cited 9×
• Johnson v. M. J. Uline Co.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1944-12-27· cited 5×
• Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Thomas
  D.C. Circuit· 1936-04-06· cited 4×
• Tipton v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
  District of Columbia· 1946-12-02· cited 1×