Great a & P Tea Co. v. Aveilhe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• jury could not reasonably infer that a ―series of events consisting of two clerks conversing, laughing, and one pulling upon the other causing him to fall into a bystanding customer, could be of any benefit to their employer or in furtherance of the duties assigned to them‖

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).