Skip to main content
· 1/10/2003

Grazyna Zalewska v. County of Sullivan, New York, Judith Maier and Terence O'Neill

Citations

  • 316 F.3d 314
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 393
  • 90 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1193
  • 2003 WL 115255

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the First Amendment’s protections
  • wearing a skirt is not speech because ordinary viewer would glean no particular message from it
  • “Essential to deciding whether an activity carries a perceptible message entitled to protection is an examination of the context in which the activity was conducted.”
  • “[A] person’s choice of dress or appearance in an ordinary context does not possess the communicative elements necessary to be considered speech-like conduct entitled to First Amendment protection.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meskill, Cardamone, Straub

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.