Graziano v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, ETC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting that argument there is a different standard for area variances as “unconvincing” because the statute “requires a showing of unnecessary hardship for either use or area variances”
• stating \[t]he board cannot alter the zoning ordinances by granting variances.... The power to change the zoning restrictions belongs to the zoning commission and the city council.\
• stating “[t]he board cannot alter the zoning ordinances by granting variances.... The power to change the zoning restrictions belongs to the zoning commission and the city council.”
• stating \[t]he board cannot alter the zoning ordinances by granting variances ... . The power to change the zoning restrictions belongs to the zoning commission and the city council.\
• reviewing a certiorari action and reversing the board’s granting of a variance
• reviewing a certiorari action and reversing the board's granting of a variance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).