Grayton Koenig v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “motions for attorney’s fees provided by contract are permissible under Rule 54(d)(2)”
• analyzing Texas law, court determined that motions for attorneys’ fees provided by mortgage contracts are permissible under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(2)
• analyzing Texas law to determine that motions for attorney fees provided by mortgage contracts are permissible
• reversing the district court’s order denying the defendant’s motion for attorney’s fees and holding that motions for attorney's fees provided by contract are permissible under Rule 54(d)(2)
• “[The Fifth Circuit] reviews legal questions regarding the application of Rule 54(d)(2) de novo.” (citing Romaguera v. Gegenheimer, 162 F.3d 893, 895 (5th Cir.1998))
• “Under Texas law, attorney’s fees are recoverable … if authorized by statute or contract.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).