Graybow-Daniels Co. v. Pinotti

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e continue to hold that the redemption requirements of Minn. S[ta]t. 580.24 must be strictly adhered to * * *.”
• “The statute at issue has been extant in an essentially unchanged form since 1878 * * *.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).