Graybeal v. Conley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting ineffective assistance of counsel claim and explaining that the PCR court’s one error in a factual finding did not render the PCR court’s ultimate conclusion unreasonable
• granting a COA on penalty phase IAC claim under 24 Browning but denying a COA on guilt phase IAC claim because counsel’s omission occurred during a “separate and discrete” phase
• “Section 2254(d)(2) imposes a ‘daunting standard’ to disrupt a state court’s factual findings, which precludes relief in all but ‘relatively few cases.’” (quoting Taylor, 366 F.3d at 1000)
• “If there are no errors, there is no need to consider their cumulative effect.”
• “If there are no errors, there is no need to consider their cumulative effect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).